Default

US appeals court dismisses motion challenging permits for natural gas pipeline

[ad_1]

A federal appeals courtroom has granted a movement to dismiss a problem to building permits for a controversial pure gasoline pipeline in Virginia and West Virginia after Congress mandated that the challenge transfer ahead

ByJOHN RABY Related Press

Mountain Valley Pipeline

FILE – Activists with the indigenous environmental community block an entrance to the White Home as they protest the road three pipeline, Wednesday, June 30, 2021, in Washington. The Supreme Courtroom is permitting building to renew on a contested natural-gas pipeline that’s being constructed by way of Virginia and West Virginia. Work had been halted by the federal appeals courtroom in Richmond, even after Congress ordered the challenge’s approval as a part of the bipartisan invoice to extend the debt ceiling. President Joe Biden signed the invoice into regulation in June. (AP Picture/Alex Brandon, File)

The Related Press

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A federal appeals courtroom on Friday granted a movement to dismiss a problem to building permits for a controversial pure gasoline pipeline in Virginia and West Virginia after Congress mandated that the challenge transfer ahead.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, sided with legal professionals from Mountain Valley Pipeline in dismissing challenges to the challenge by environmental teams over issues concerning the pipeline’s influence on endangered species, erosion and stream sedimentation.

The U.S. Supreme Courtroom final month allowed building to renew. Work had been blocked by the 4th Circuit, even after Congress ordered the challenge’s approval as a part of the bipartisan invoice to extend the debt ceiling. President Joe Biden signed the invoice into regulation in June.

Attorneys for the pipeline argued earlier than the appeals courtroom two weeks in the past that Congress was inside its rights to strip the 4th Circuit from jurisdiction over the case. In addition they mentioned that any debate over the regulation’s constitutionality needs to be heard not by the 4th Circuit however by an appellate courtroom in Washington, as a result of the regulation handed by Congress spells out that exact situation.

“Armed with this new laws enacted particularly of their favor, Respondents — the federal businesses and the Mountain Valley Pipeline — moved on this Courtroom for the dismissal of the petitions,” appeals choose James Wynn wrote. “Upon consideration of the issues earlier than us, we should grant Respondents’ motions to dismiss.”

Environmental teams have opposed the the $6.6 billion challenge, designed to fulfill rising power calls for within the South and Mid-Atlantic by transporting gasoline from the Marcellus and Utica fields in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

[ad_2]

Source link