Man suing Buffalo Wild Wings says firm doesn’t ‘give a s–t’ about his boneless wings grievance

He refuses to rooster out.

The person who claims that the boneless wings at Buffalo Wild Wings are nothing more than chicken nuggets requested a choose to not throw out his class-action lawsuit as a result of it could solely gas the restaurant’s disrepect for poultry lovers.

Aimen Halim’s lawsuit made headlines throughout the nation because it was filed final March, with Buffalo Wild Wings showing to mock his claims on social media.

“‘We don’t give a s—,’” the corporate stated in an Instagram post in Might, explaining: “Buffalo Wild Wings on when folks say boneless wings aren’t wings.”

The restaurant chain then requested the US District Court docket for the Northern District of Illinois to dismiss the case.

Halim filed a response on Friday slamming the corporate for its mockery of his considerations, claiming that the court docket ought to punish them by permitting his lawsuit to hold on, Insider reports.

“As a substitute, BWW determined to go low, issuing a brazen official response: ‘We don’t give a s—.,’” the lawsuit states. “Such hubris shouldn’t be rewarded, particularly when BWW’s motive is kind of easy: income.”

Aimen, of Chicago, filed a lawsuit in opposition to Buffalo Wild Wings in March over claims of “false and misleading advertising and marketing and promoting” when it got here to their boneless wings, which he stated are derived from rooster breast and never rooster wing meat.

“Certainly, the Merchandise are extra akin, in composition, to a rooster nugget slightly than a rooster wing,” the doc reads.

As reparations for the alleged rooster dupe, the swimsuit calls for a jury trial, an unspecified quantity of punitive damages, lawyer charges and another fines as decided by the choose, per court docket paperwork.

Buffalo Wild Wings has filed for the lawsuit to be dismissed, and together with its put up showing to mock Aimen’s claims straight, the corporate additionally put out extra tweets poking enjoyable on the lawsuit.

“It’s true. Our boneless wings are all chicken rooster. Our hamburgers comprise no ham. Our buffalo wings are 0% buffalo,” the corporate wrote.

Buffalo Wild Wings didn’t instantly reply to The Submit’s request for remark.

Halim’s complaints aren’t solely directed on the restaurant, as he has a historical past of suing firms over alleged false advertising and marketing.

The plaintiff’s prior fits have concerned a case claiming that the “pure” label on Tom’s of Maine Depraved Contemporary Mouthwash and the “excessive in fiber” label on Sort granola are all inaccurate.

He additionally claimed that Hefty misled prospects by labeling its baggage “recyclable” when that wasn’t the case — a swimsuit that was dismissed in August.