Biden Administration Tells US Supreme Court to Review Social Media Laws

(Reuters) – President Joe Biden’s administration urged the U.S. Supreme Court docket to take up a dispute over Republican-backed legal guidelines in Texas and Florida that will undercut efforts by social media firms to curb content material deemed objectionable on their platforms.

The states name the actions impermissible censorship.

The justices are contemplating taking on two instances involving challenges to the state legal guidelines introduced by expertise trade teams together with NetChoice, whose members embody Meta Platforms Inc Alphabet Inc, and X, previously often called Twitter.

Supporters of the legal guidelines, handed in 2021, have argued that social media platforms have silenced conservative voices, whereas advocates of content material moderation have argued for the necessity to cease misinformation and advocacy for extremist causes.

Florida is in search of to revive its regulation after a decrease court docket dominated largely towards it, whereas the trade teams are interesting a separate decrease court docket choice upholding the Texas regulation, which the Supreme Court docket blocked at an earlier stage of the case.

Invited to weigh in on the dispute, the Justice Division on Monday stated the instances advantage evaluation as a result of the legal guidelines burden the platforms’ rights beneath the U.S. Structure’s First Modification, which protects freedom of speech.

“When a social-media platform selects, edits, and arranges third-party speech for presentation to the general public, it engages in exercise protected by the First Modification,” the Justice Division stated in a written transient.

The instances would take a look at the argument made by the trade teams that the First Modification protects platforms’ editorial discretion and prohibits governments from forcing them to publish content material towards their will.

The businesses have stated that with out editorial discretion their web sites can be overrun with spam, bullying, extremism and hate speech.

Florida’s regulation requires massive platforms to “host some speech that they may in any other case desire to not host” by disclosing censorship guidelines and prohibiting the banning of any political candidates. Texas’ regulation forbids censoring customers based mostly on “viewpoint.”

(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Enhancing by Sonali Paul)

Copyright 2023 Thomson Reuters.